Skip to content

Mainland China-Headed Groups

Build a coordinated view of overseas subsidiaries, intermediate holding structures and jurisdiction-specific requirements.

Applicable period:
Financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2024

1. Who this guide is for

This guide is for multinational groups whose ultimate parent entity is in mainland China, including privately owned and state-owned groups, and for the accounting firms that advise them.

Many of these groups hold overseas operations through intermediate holding companies in jurisdictions such as Hong Kong or Singapore. That structure is often the key to the analysis.

2. Why parent location matters

Enactment and commencement of a mainland Chinese IIR, UTPR or QDMTT have not been established from the sources reviewed for this guide. Confirm current domestic legislation and effective dates for the period under review; absence from an OECD record is not proof of non-enactment.

Regardless of the parent jurisdiction’s implementation position, overseas rules may create exposure: a domestic minimum top-up tax where profits arise, an IIR applied by an intermediate parent, or a UTPR elsewhere. Determine the applicable domestic rules, rule order and relief for the relevant period.

Profits earned in mainland China itself can also be relevant. Where preferential rates or incentives bring the effective tax rate of the group’s mainland entities below the minimum rate, other jurisdictions’ rules may reach those profits.

3. Questions about overseas operations

  • Which intermediate holding companies sit in jurisdictions that apply an Income Inclusion Rule, and would they be required to apply it?
  • Which jurisdictions where the group operates apply a domestic minimum top-up tax, and from which period?
  • Do preferential rates or incentives bring the effective tax rate of any mainland entities below the minimum rate?
  • Which jurisdictions where the group has entities apply the Undertaxed Profits Rule, and from which period?
  • For state-owned groups, how are entities classified, and do any exclusions apply?
  • Is financial data prepared under PRC accounting standards, and what conversion is needed for the calculation?

4. Local implementation information by rule and financial period

RuleStatusApplicable periodSource
QDMTTQualified Domestic Minimum Top-up TaxNot enacted (to be confirmed)Commencement not establishedNo implementing instrument established in the source review
IIRIncome Inclusion RuleNot enacted (to be confirmed)Commencement not establishedNo implementing instrument established in the source review
UTPRUndertaxed Profits RuleNot enacted (to be confirmed)Commencement not establishedNo implementing instrument established in the source review

The table distinguishes domestic implementation from OECD qualification. Qualification and safe-harbour eligibility must be checked for the relevant rule and period. Absence from the OECD Central Record does not establish non-enactment or non-qualification. Where implementation is described as not established, this identifies a limitation of the sources reviewed.

5. Potential reliefs requiring assessment

  • The transitional CbCR safe harbour, using the country-by-country report the group prepares, where the data meets the tests.
  • The transitional UTPR safe harbour, which for early periods can relieve the parent jurisdiction from the Undertaxed Profits Rule where its corporate income tax rate is at least 20%. Its periods and conditions need to be confirmed.
  • Safe harbours for qualified domestic minimum top-up taxes in the jurisdictions that apply them.
  • Governmental entities and certain entities owned by excluded entities may qualify for exclusion only where the detailed GloBE conditions are met. State ownership or wholly owned status alone does not establish exclusion.
  • The OECD extension is not, by itself, proof of domestic adoption. IRAS has announced implementation; Swiss guidance confirms direct applicability; Australian rules enact the extension; and Japan’s 2026 reform explanation confirms a one-year extension. Adoption in another jurisdiction must be established from its own rules or official guidance.

6. Reporting considerations

Without a filing system in the parent jurisdiction, the group may need to appoint a designated filing entity in another jurisdiction to file the GloBE Information Return, or file in each jurisdiction that requires one.

Jurisdictions applying a domestic minimum top-up tax may require local registration and returns, whether or not top-up tax is payable.

7. Information to prepare

  • Legal entity chart showing ownership percentages, intermediate holding companies and the jurisdiction of each entity
  • Consolidated revenue for the four financial years before each period under review
  • Country-by-country report data by jurisdiction
  • Financial statements and tax expense, including deferred tax and incentives, for each jurisdiction
  • Eligible payroll costs and tangible assets by jurisdiction
  • English translations of key financial and tax information for overseas advisors

8. Official sources

Discuss your group

Tell us where your group’s parent company is based, where it operates and what you need to understand.

Discuss your group